🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam decision, the nation's top court permitted Texas to implement a revised congressional map that could add several five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, released on Thursday, grants a request by the state to lift a district court's injunction that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating significant confusion and disrupting the fine balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its decision.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had probably classified voters based on their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to revert to the districts created after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissent

With a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's decision. She argued that it undermined the work of the lower court, noting that its ruling was crafted by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a breach of the constitution.

National Redistricting Fight

The ruling is part of a national contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican hold. Typically, redistricting takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add several more Republican-leaning seats. The opposition, in response, have responded with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State AG hailed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures representation favorable to the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

Conversely, Democratic leaders criticized the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

Another leading House figure said the court had yet again damaged its standing by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.