🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where yesterday went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously went for the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. However overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.